For many years, some Minnesota municipalities have maintained a tight control over the sale of alcohol within their borders. Historically, the justification of this control centered on maintaining community standards and attitudes. However, there is another reason which propels municipalities into the liquor business. Many cities discovered that if they can create a government-controlled monopoly by banning the private sale of an item, they can noticeably increase government revenue. This can prove to be a fleeting benefit.
Let’s take a look at local liquor sales. Edina has operated three liquor stores for decades. The profits from the liquor sales help fund parks, arts, and pay down capital. In 2012, nearly $1.5 million in profit was generated by liquor sales in Edina. Unfortunately, no one in the Edina city government thought that would change.
But it did. The liquor profits fell to $600,000 in 2015, the last year in which figures are available. The 2017 figures may decrease even further. Regrettably, no one on the City Council or the City Administration budgeted for fluctuations in that revenue stream.Read more
In July we reported on John Hinderacker's series of articles regarding indoctrination and intimidation at Edina Schools. SD49's Bill Holm has been following the continued comments from Edina parents and students to Hinderacker's articles on the Center of the American Experiment site, and highlights more of their specific examples.
Partisan Politics and White Privilege in Edina Schools
We have heard periodically of the left-leaning pronouncements of teachers in the Edina School System. These sentiments apparently were on full display when Donald Trump’s election became clear last November.
John Hinderacker, president of the Center of the American Experiment, began to get phone calls and emails from concerned Edina parents in late June. He reported: “On November 22, 2016, 80 teachers–a remarkable number–signed an editorial addressed to the student body. The 80 teachers who signed this editorial align themselves with the Democratic Party and its candidate, Hillary Clinton.”
Mr. Hinderacker, and others, proceeded to gather detailed information on the teachers’ “manifesto” and more complaints from Edina parents. They then published a series of eye-opening on-line articles based on these complaintsRead more
Edina is considering a study to operate light rail commuter trains on the Dan Patch corridor. If the citizens that turned out for the “community engagement forum” on July 25 were any indication, supporters in the standing-room-only crowd were decidedly in the minority.
The Dan Patch Line is essentially a single track that runs from Northfield to Savage. It then crosses the Minnesota River into Bloomington and runs north along the east side of Hyland Park. It continues north through Edina to St Louis Park, staying west of Highway 100.
The information provided at the forum may be accessed by CLICKING HERE. When reviewing the information, consider that
After a $400,000 study and considerable local opposition, local legislators did not support a light rail operation in this corridor in 2002.
Freight traffic will continue on this single line, and will likely increase.
To reduce costs from earlier estimates, the commuter trains would have to run on the same track, without an increase in right-of-way, over 14 same-grade road crossings, with unique cars that cannot operate on the other existing light rail tracks.
Edina needs the support of the cities of Bloomington, Savage, and St Louis Park to make going forward with a study realistic. Several of the Bloomington city council candidates do not support this option now.
Edina will continue to gather community feedback, with a follow-up meeting scheduled for September. Edina residents are urged to let their city council members know of their concerns about pursuing the proposed $30,000 study.Read more
The Center of the American Experiment (CAE) has just published disturbing stories about partisan politics being injected into the Edina Public Schools. A group of 80 teachers thought it was appropriate to publish an editorial in the Zephyrus, the “official news site of Edina High School,” lamenting the election of Donald Trump. Their editorial stated: “you’ve heard and read a lot of calls for unity for the school and the nation. This letter is not one of them. . . . We will teach rebellion against a broken world.” The leader of this group of 80 teachers is Tim Klobuchar, a relative of US Senator Amy Klobuchar. CAE’s conclusion “For whatever reason, the Edina public schools are paying Democratic Party activists to indoctrinate their children.” Even more disturbing are comments on the story from Edina parents and students, describing other instances of this politically biased behavior in the school. The most recent articles were published in the last few days on the Center of the American Experiment website here and here.
This follows close on the heels of another story, this one from Intellectual Takeout regarding politically charged teaching about “social justice,” racism and white privilege at Highlands Elementary School. The story is available on their website here.
Four of the seven seats on the Edina School Board are up for election this fall on Tuesday, November 7, 2017. If you agree that students are being deprived of their right to a sound education by teachers who substitute partisan propaganda and bullying for normal instruction, work with us to return ethical teaching methods to the Edina school system. Help us identify school board candidates who will stand up for this change. The filing period for candidates seeking to run is from August 1 to August 15.
The 2017 Legislative Session might have gone down as one of the most productive in recent memory. More likely, it will be remembered for the governor that didn’t have the honor and self-confidence to live with the compromises that he and his team negotiated.
Several of the predictions made by the panel at our Spring Conversation almost came true. The panelists predicted that negotiations would proceed during the final week of the session, and no special session would be needed. In fact, the negotiations between the Republican legislative leaders and the Governor and his staff went down to the wire. A short extension was required to sort out the details, but the Governor ultimately signed the budget bills. A government shutdown was avoided.
This should have signaled a triumph for all. Instead, Gov. Dayton exercised a veto of a line item that funds the legislature after July 2017. His intent is to force the Legislature back to the bargaining table to secure more of the DFL hot-button items (reduced tax cuts, licenses for undocumented aliens, tighter teacher credentials) -- items that he had agreed to forego in the earlier negotiations. In the June 3 opinion section of the Star Tribune, a thoughtful article written by Paul Gazelka and Kurt Daudt details why he’s wrong.
While the Republicans achieved some important goals this session, they clearly did not achieve everything. Not all of the budget surplus was allocated for roads and bridges and for tax cuts. Republicans did not get tax credits for private school scholarships (OAK), and harsher penalties for blocking highways and other transportation hubs were not included in the final bills. While not all that he wanted, Dayton got more money for his personal crusade for pre-K education.
As former Senate Minority Leader David Hann said during the Spring Conversation, Dayton simply doesn’t know how to negotiate – he doesn’t “”get” the concept that both sides need to be happy at the end.
While the major media in Minnesota have been largely silent on Dayton’s potentially unconstitutional action, we can hope that Minnesotans let the governor know that he should accept what he got and be done with it.
At our March 28, 2017 dinner meeting, Jeff Johnson presented convincing reasons to not build the proposed light rail lines. Watch here.
Minnesota Republicans, joined by more than 20 from SD49, filled the ballroom at the Radisson Blu at the Mall of America on March 23 for the annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner. Dennis Prager was the featured speaker, and the huge crowd listened intently as he told them that America is in the midst of a second Civil War. Not as violent as its first Civil War, but a war over fundamental values that is every bit as important.
Prager believes that America’s uniqueness in the world is based on its founding values:
- One Nation Under God, and
- E Pluribus Unum (Out of Many, One).
These values are being challenged by what Prager calls ““Leftism”. The Left holds that the supreme values should be
- Equality of Outcomes, rather than Liberty
- A Godless Society (where a person’s actions are ultimately answerable to the government rather than to Almighty God)
- Multiculturalism (Promoting Diversity, rather than Unity)
These counter values, Prager argues, are being promulgated by our schools, colleges, and universities. The intellectuals that make these institutions are almost all of one mind when it comes to rejecting the pursuit of individual excellence and personal responsibility. The ideas that they promote are ultimately achievable only through the subjugation of the individual to the collective, of independent thought to uniform group-think, and of personal responsibility to government-granted “rights”. As just one example, he pointed out to the vehement criticism being directed from American campuses at Israel’s human rights record. And not a peep about North Korea’s absolute disregard for the rights of its own people.
As a highly-recognized conservative commentator on radio, Prager noted that when he asked people that he’s met from eastern European countries what they see as the most profound difference between their countries and America, they say “Talk Radio”.
As an observant Jew and fervent reader of American history, he strongly believes that America today is the least anti-Semitic and least racist nation on Earth. “America is an aberration of goodness.”
We highly recommend that you read Kim Crockett’s opinion piece in the January 20, 2017 edition of the Star Tribune, reprinted on the CoAE site. “How Much is ‘Green Bling’ Costing your Town or City” argues that Edina’s expensive foray into solar power panels is an example of “feel-good environment projects”.
A 2014 study done by the Center of the American Experiment concluded that Edina’s 2011 city hall rooftop project had a very low return when compared to the costs being funded by Edina’s 50,000 federal taxpayers and Xcel ratepayers. Given the savings generated by that Edina solar power plan, it will take 154 years to cover the costs. The panels themselves only have a useful life of a few decades.
The article’s key points:
The scale of Edina’s project is too small to measurably reduce greenhouse gases
Money spent on other conservation actions would most likely deliver much more immediate returns
If Edina still wants to invest in so-called “green” technology to reduce carbon emissions, it should be willing to justify spending its own money
As citizens, we need to continue to take a closer look at what our city staffs are putting in front of our city councils. We need to volunteer to serve on our city commissions.
While embracing true conservation measures that better our cities, we need to help our councils say “no” to “free” grants and federal money that can’t be justified by returns on investment.
(Photo is of a similar city hall rooftop project in Falcon Heights.)
Legislature Should Take Tax Actions To Slow Minnesota's Great Wealth Migration
Peter Nelson of the Center of the American Experiment and Dale Kurschner of “Twin Cities Business” have written in 2016 about the flight of wealthy individuals from Minnesota to states where they are “better appreciated.” Thousands are now moving billions of dollars in annual taxable income, gross estate value and net worth to other, more welcoming states. Nelson and Kurschner identified two primary reasons: higher taxes and a growing perception that the state government does not respect its business people.
Higher Taxes. In 2014 and 2015, Minnesota lost or began losing an estimated $2.1 billion in taxable income from 3,099 taxpayers. These same individuals have $17 billion in median net worth and $31 billion in median gross estate value. In almost three-quarters of those moves, respondents said the reason for leaving had to do with Minnesota’s tax policy and collection practices.Read more
We now know that this election cycle’s harassment, confrontation, sign-burning and even violent attacks on Republican supporters were coordinated and funded by Democrat activists. These and other acts of intimidation have been escalating since the mid-1990’s. But they reached new highs (or lows) as the IRS under the Obama Administration focused on Tea Party organizations applying for nonprofit status. And intimidation continued as prosecutors in Wisconsin used unconstitutional “John Doe” investigations in 2013 – 2015 to suppress conservatives in that state.
The Intimidation Game is a well-written, page-turner of a book. It is the stories of individuals who’ve been “called up, served up, beat up, and run out” for taking part in political causes. Kimberley Strassel explains in understandable language some of the legal twists and turns. Strassel reveals how we got from the 1950’s Supreme Court decision that protected the rights of Americans to engage in politics with some degree of anonymity to today’s pressures for full and immediate disclosure, without regard for the risks of retaliation.
The Intimidation Game: How the Left is Silencing Free Speech, by Kimberley Strassel, c.2016, ISBN 978-1-4555-9188-6, Twelve/Hachette Book Group.
To see a video of author Kimberley Strassel speaking in June 2016 at a forum hosted by the Heritage Foundation,