The debate about raising Minnesota's minimum wage to $15 per hour has been in the news a lot lately. On the surface, it sounds like a good idea. Why wouldn't we want people in low skill jobs to make more money? However, what's not often mentioned or understood is that raising the minimum wage will ultimately hurt the people it's meant to benefit. Substantially increasing a business's labor cost will result in fewer jobs (layoffs and less hiring) and increases in the prices customers must pay for their goods and services. In some instances, mandating higher wages could force marginal businesses to close.
Recent coordinated nationwide 'Fight for $15’ protests held at the end of November have spurred on propaganda and news stories. It is curious that often people who don't even work at the businesses under protest seem to be leading the protests.
The protests appear to be union backed and/or driven. Are the unions involved purely out of altruism or do they have another motive? Would the unions benefit from a higher minimum wage? Some radio talk hosts suggest that many union contracts have a pay scale that is linked to minimum wage. Unions are also trying to organize the various service industry workers. If those workers unionize, it means more dues for the parent union(s). Writing about this is not an attempt to disparage unions. Unions have been and can be good and bring much needed changes to the benefit of workers. That said, in this case it appears unions may have ulterior motives in the 'Fight for $15.'Read more
An article by Ricardo Lopez, published in the Star Tribune on September 28, on the MN Supreme Court decision to dismiss the MVA suit, (requiring that it first be heard in a District Court), included this note:
“Recent court decisions have rejected stricter voter regulations approved in Kansas, North Carolina, North Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin, finding in virtually all cases that voter fraud is nonexistent and that the tougher regulations disenfranchised minority voters.”
Ironically, Fox & Friends reported the next day, on September 29 that Arcan Cetan, the man who went on a shooting rampage, killing 5, at a Washington state mall north of Seattle, wasn't even a U.S. citizen but he still voted three times!
Cetan was a permanent U.S. resident but had never applied for citizenship. Nonetheless, he registered to vote and participated in three voting cycles. Like Minnesota, the state of Washington operates on the honor system. Cetan did not have to provide proof of citizenship when he registered to voteRead more
The following has been adapted from an opinion piece that Max Rymer, our 49B candidate for the Minnesota House, posted on his campaign website:
In typical millennial fashion, I am writing you an open letter. Not because I have something I want to say directly to you, but because I want to make a point to everyone else reading it.
MNSure, last weekend I knocked a low-income housing unit in Bloomington. I talked to a young man, Jerell, who had been on Minnesota Medical Assistance for the better part of a decade. He informed me that, since your inception, he had seen his own costs go up and his benefits go down. Jerell had a number of medical issues, was also on disability, and had preexisting-type conditions that disqualified him from a number of private-insurance options.
MNSure, this confused me.
This man would have and should have been one of the biggest benefactors of the supposed 95% of people who now have affordable coverage.
But he wasn’t.Read more
Our ballot this year will include a state constitutional amendment to establish a commission whose purpose is to set the compensation payable to Minnesota state legislators. Today, the legislators themselves must vote whether or not to increase their pay.
As you may be uncertain how you should vote on this proposed amendment, we offer you MN Rep. Matt Dean's advice, which he posted on FACEBOOK, September 21, 2016.
Rep Matt Dean on the Constitutional Amendment to Raise Legislator Pay
You should vote NO on the legislator pay increase amendment on your ballot this November. Here is why:
The lawmakers pushing this want to get more pay. But the way the law is written makes it look like if you vote YES you are voting to stop us from doing that very thing. That’s duplicitous. It’s wrong. But that’s what government is becoming. Politicians who publicly pretend to fight against that which they work with the other party to privately enact.
In Minnesota, our base salary is about $31,000/year. We also receive per diem (which can be over $10K)Read more
An August 24 MN Supreme Court decision may, eventually, open the door for nonprofits to challenge the pass-through utility Franchise Fee schemes that have become popular ways for cities like Bloomington and Edina to fund road, sidewalk and trail repairs without constraining discretionary budgets or increasing property taxes.
While the cities of Bloomington and Edina have made no comment on the court decision, the City of Duluth is wisely not waiting for someone to file a separate lawsuit on their Franchise Fees that are directed towards general city services like road repair. Instead Duluth is responsibly and proactively making plans to adjust tax levies and their budget priorities to ensure non-Franchise Fee funding for such core city services.
The MN Supreme Court unanimously decided against the City of St. Paul and for two churches that appealed their right-of-way (ROW) fee assessments. The judgement stated that these fees were actually taxes and so must be administered as such. Constitutional limits on taxes exempt churches and other nonprofits. The case is now back In District Court for final resolution.Read more
On September 7, the Edina City Council did not approve the current proposed project for Braemar Park – which included the addition of a 50-foot-wide Nordic Ski Trail and an11-lane tubing hill, with snowmaking for both. Most Council members based their rejection on the high cost of the proposal, the inherent noise and light pollution, the dangers to public safety that snow-making machines would introduce, and the incredibly rapid pace at which the project was moving forward. The Council asked the Parks and Recreation Department to instead refocus attention to resolution of the neglected 2015 list of priorities, which includes a “master plan” for redevelopment of the Braemar area.
This "mistake" cost taxpayers some $150k - 200k in "exploratory" (feasibility) studies that should not have been implemented prior to the completion and approval of a master plan for the golf course. We Edina residents need to put continued pressure on this Council and demand better stewardship of our tax dollars so that this type of waste doesn’t happen again. Indeed, the articulate and respectful outpouring of opposition to this proposal had an impact, something Mayor Jim Hovland acknowledged thoughtfully at the public hearing.Read more
The Southwest Light Rail Transit plan is the latest power grab by the big government planners at the Metropolitan Council. Accountable to no-one but the Governor, the Metropolitan Council is intent on re-imagining our lives through centralized planning. The central feature of this centralized planning is ever increasing levels of light rail transit. While some refer to the “dream” of light rail, the reality is more like a nightmare.
The so-called “Green Line Extension,” otherwise known as the Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT), appeared to be in jeopardy when the Minnesota legislature did not approve $144.5 million in state funding for it. However, in a calculated political move, Gov Dayton bypassed the legislature. He got three metropolitan boards to come up with the funding instead.Read more
On Wednesday, September 7, at 7pm, the Edina City Council will essentially decide between good stewardship of our tax dollars and fiscal irresponsibility. Please mark your calendars for the public hearing on this issue at Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. If you can attend to simply show support for fiscal responsibility, you are reminding the Council that it’s our money, not theirs. If you wish to speak at the public hearing, please do so. Writing emails and letters to the Edina City Council is making a difference, so if you cannot attend the hearing, that’s a powerful way to help.
Recently, we wrote about a proposal put forth to the Edina City Council to construct a winter “recreation facility” within Braemar Golf Course. LINK to article
It includes plowing a 50-foot wide Nordic ski path that would run about 3 km (2 miles) around the perimeter of Braemar, along with an 11-lane “tubing hill.” The proposal would raise taxes, and cost visitors money to do what can be done today in the existing space, but for free.Read more
A week ago, Governor Dayton and legislative Democrats walked away from special session negotiations and agreements on tax relief and bonding over their insistence on a funding mechanism for Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT).
On August 25, Governor Dayton hastily convened a meeting with Metropolitan Council Chair Adam Duininck, local elected officials, legislators and other community representatives. At the meeting, Governor Dayton unveiled a new proposal to go around the legislature and fund the state's share of the Southwest Light Rail project.
The Governor, Chair Duininck and Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB) Chair/Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin made clear it is their intention to pursue this funding strategy even though it will commit taxpayers statewide to tens of millions in permanent operating losses, as well as likely property tax increases for Hennepin County.Read more
Decision on Special Session about much more than Light Rail
Governor Dayton announced on August 18 that he would not call a special session of the legislature this year. He said that his decision was based on Republican opposition to funding of the Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT), but his plans for spending rather than tax relief likely factored in as well.
A special session of the MN legislature was sought because the regular session ended without passage of several important funding measures, including:
A $600 million bonding bill, scuttled when the DFL Senate at the last moment tried to add SWLRT funding to a bill that had passed the House with strong bipartisan support. Senate District 49 DFL Senator Melisa Franzen was one of seven DFL state senators who threatened to withhold their support from the 2016 bonding bill if $135 million in state funding for the SWLRT wasn’t approved.
- The omnibus tax bill, with support of 89 percent of the legislature, was vetoed by Gov. Dayton due to a one-word drafting error.
The DFL governor held these bipartisan-supported funding initiatives hostage to his demand that $135 million more of state revenue be spent on SWLRT. Is SWLRT really that critical to Gov. Dayton? Or is he using it as a convenient excuse to delay, hoping that the House will again be in DFL control after the election?Read more