As the days counted down and we got closer to election day, the general outline of the two parties’ campaigns began to gel. Patterns have emerged and ideas larger than mere “positions” take on a more decisive role. In nearly every campaign in this historic election season, the pattern is repeated again and again: DFL candidates see public office as a vehicle for unlimited partisan warfare, while GOP candidates see public office as a vehicle to preserve the rules and customs that allow us to disagree and debate peacefully.
The most visible example of this evolving picture is the campaign for the Minnesota Attorney General between DFLer Keith Ellison and Republican Doug Wardlow. The office of Attorney General itself is one of the most powerful constitutional offices within the Executive Branch. First, its occupant owes nothing to the Governor who heads the Constitutional Branch that it’s a part of, and second, it allows such a wide range of discretion to its occupant that it could easily be said that he or she can define it by choosing which powers to exercise and which to ignore.
DFLer Keith Ellison has openly promised to use the powers of the office to pursue a laundry list of blatantly partisan PC crusades and mindlessly quixotic “Resistance” litigations, while studiously ignoring the need to rigorously and equally enforce the laws of Minnesota. With all of his massive load of hypocritical baggage, including a long-time association with Louis Farrakhan and credible allegations of domestic abuse, Keith Ellison is a veritable poster child for unequal and partisan law enforcement.
Republican Doug Wardlow, on the other hand, campaigns across the state on exactly the opposite set of priorities. He’s promised a sweeping house-cleaning of partisan advocates within the Minnesota Department of Justice, and rigorously equal enforcement of all the laws, regardless of partisan affiliation or ideological alignment. The choice is starkly clear and painfully central to everything we expect of government in a free society.
At the risk of sounding apocalyptic, it’s not too extreme to assert that the law itself, the skeletal framework of civil society, is squarely on the table. In Keith Ellison’s world, and in the wider DFL world, the law is to be used to punish and destroy those who dare to disagree with Progressive orthodoxy, and to shield those who agree. In Doug Wardlow’s Republican world, the law is to be used to make it safe for ALL OF US to exercise all of our rights, including the right to disagree, with civility. Doug knows that equal ENFORCEMENT of the law is the logical foundation for the equal PROTECTION of the law, and that JUSTICE IS EITHER BLIND OR ITS DEAD!
Erik Paulsen is the best choice to represent us in Congress. He is hard-working and experienced. He has earned his position on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee which has jurisdiction over health care, economic and trade policy and is the chief tax writing committee in the House of Representatives. He is co-chair of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Caucus to promote trade with Europe.
Erik has authored some important legislation, combatting sex trafficking, reforming child welfare systems, and repealing the Medical Devices tax.
He has stood his ground on issues important to him, speaking against legislation that would deny the Boundary Waters Canoe Area the same environmental protections that other National Forests receive. He has been endorsed by another outstanding former congressman, Jim Ramstad.
Paulsen has been unfairly criticized for accepting PAC money. It should be noted that his opponent, Dean Phillips (photo at right in his "Winnie the Election" costume) has resorted to self-funding his own campaign out of his personal wealth. Phillips had previously issued his “Minnesota Way” pledge, and called such self-funding “Not Democratic”. He’s also broken another pledge by failing to donate to charity any of the millions he has accepted in outside ads running on his behalf funded by the same special interests he claims to oppose.
If you want to be represented by a knowledgeable legislator who is not flamboyant, who works hard for his constituents, and who is in a position to make his experience count, vote for the adult in the room. Vote for Erik Paulsen.
Recent polls are showing that several of the state and local races this year are tightening. The differences in some polls are within the margin of error, meaning that the race could go either way. It is very important that we take every opportunity to talk with our family, friends, and neighbors about voting. A significant minority of the people polled say they are still undecided. Some even question why they should vote!
Cutting through all of the political advertising and media sound bites, Republican and Democratic candidates in Minnesota reflect a clear difference in governing philosophy and policy priorities. Here are ten reasons to vote Republican:
1. Republicans believe in personal responsibility. We want the freedom to make choices that affect our lives, not have a faceless bureaucracy make those choices for us.
2. Republicans believe that government regulations should be limited to the intent of the laws, not expanded to achieve a political agenda. Regulations are necessary, but over-regulation discourages the growth of business and stifles innovation. For example, we believe that proposed mining operations should be allowed to proceed once fair and reasonable environment assessments and mitigation plans have been completed.
3. Republicans believe in the value of marketplace capitalism and the role of competition. Actions that restrict marketplaces, such as single-payer health care, sustain the status quo, restrain innovation, and do little to reduce costs over the long run.
4. Republicans believe that government has an essential role to play. As Republican State Senator Julie Rosen wrote in an opinion piece in the Star Tribune on October 13, “even the most frugal Minnesotan can get behind good government spending on things like public safety, roads, child welfare and health care for the poor and elderly.”
The last several months, beginning with the election of 2016 and culminating in the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, have made it very plain to even the most casual of observers, that Democrats have adopted the most terrifying set of political behaviors in the last 100 years of American history. With hysterical mobs of screaming protestors in the hallways of the Senate, masked thugs in the streets and a gunman bent on slaughter at a baseball field, the American Left has openly proclaimed that it is willing to abandon even the most basic standards of civilization itself, and return to the days of Lynch Law, to regain its power.
The Kavanaugh hearings exhibited for all to see, that Amy Klobuchar and her fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee were perfectly comfortable with the idea that no nominee brought before them could safely rely on any right to the presumption of innocence. In fact, the mere expression of even the flimsiest allegation, without the slightest substantiation or corroboration or evidence, of an offense against any member of any identifiable victim group, was ample justification to demand endless delay, and to slander and smear the nominee beyond any hope of redemption.
When Democrats were challenged by Republicans defending the nominee’s right to due process and the presumption of innocence, they responded with the vapid rationalization that “this is not a criminal trial” so there was no reason for them to respect any such right. From that moment on, the hearings devolved into a ghastly replay of a Stalinist Soviet Show Trial.
The importance of the right of anyone accused of an offense to be assumed innocent until proven guilty, is not simply a minor technicality that can be ignored for temporary political convenience or limited to a formal criminal trial.Read more
I didn’t believe it when I read it. Did you? The Edina Mayor and City Council voted to suspend spending on the “LID”.
The good news is that the city recognizes that many citizens do not agree with their rush to develop the city and increase density without looking at the consequences. The bad news is there was no time limit to the suspension. If they had voted to suspend spending for 3 to 5 years I might have believed their claims that the “LID” is a long term project.
It sounds like politics as usual to make the incumbents look good just before the election. Here are some things to consider:
- The city has already spent $368,000 on the “LID” and Metro Transit has spent $100,000. The city has authorized spending $100,000 on lobbying efforts at the legislature on this project.
- Before the motion to suspend spending, the city authorized spending an additional $200,000 on the “LID” and to begin acquiring rights to property for the project.
By Frank Lorenz
If Republican candidates are going to win office in the November 6 election, we have to turn out EVERY living conservative to vote. The DFL, as usual, will start with a 900,000 vote lead from their power base in Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth.
Ballots to vote early are available 46 days before the election day, which means voting started September 21. You can request a ballot now by email to the Secretary of State, CLICK HERE or you can vote early in person at designated voting places in your county. In SD49’s 4 cities that would be our City Halls (Edina, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Minnetonka).
• If you have children in college outside the metro area, make sure they get an early ballot from the Secretary of State and use it to vote.
• If you have a relative who is in a nursing home, disabled or lives far from their polling place, help them get an early ballot for sure and encourage them vote now during these last days of September. If bad weather on election day causes people to not show up at the polls, we Republicans will lose the election.
• If you have friends or relatives who will be in Arizona, California, or Florida, etc. on election day, make sure they get an early ballot and vote.
Remember… Al Franken became a U.S. Senator when he won the election against Norm Coleman by just 312 votes.
Making phone calls and door-knocking to win new support for our candidates is good. But we must also be sure that everyone who is already a conservative votes – no exceptions.
Can you (we) afford the tax increases and spending from four years of Tim Waltz as governor and Keith Ellison as attorney general? Do you want both Tina Smith and Amy Klobuchar in the U.S. Senate for six more years??... of course not.
Our 2018 Resolution: Everyone who is a conservative votes – no exceptions
By Wayne Wenger
Is the City of Edina Transparent? Trustworthy?
That was an issue raised at the last city council election. It is still relevant. I try to keep it simple. Do I trust that the city truly listens to citizens opinions? Do the mayor and city council seek input before they embark on a major change of direction, like the increase in density that will dramatically increase our population in a few years? My answer is a resounding NO. The mayor and city council seem to be listening to the Metropolitan Council and not the residents of Edina.
Here are a few of my examples. I am sure you have your own.
Have you been asked if you want the population of Edina to grow 20% in the next few years? I haven’t. I also haven’t seen how we are going to accommodate the additional traffic, additional students in our schools, the wear and tear on our infrastructure and parks, etc. If the mayor and the city council have projected the impact of this growth on our city, they haven’t shared it with anyone that I have talked to.
Part of the problem is they only look at a single project at a time. Common sense says that building an additional 100 apartments at 50th and France, 30 units at 44th and France, and 1150 units on the “LID” over Hwy 100 at 50th would impact traffic in the 50th and France area. The city looked at them as isolated projects without any impact on each other. They concluded the impact of each of these projects was negligible. That is another reason that I don’t trust the Mayor and the Edina City council.
Kevin Staunton and Bob Stewart were asked at a League of Women Voters debate whether they supported the proposed “LID”. While other candidates answered “NO”, Staunton and Stewart said it was worth studying further. They weren’t being completely truthful. They voted to include the “LID” in the 2018 city plan. They voted and have spent $368,000 to study the “LID”. They recently voted to spend an additional $100,000 to lobby for the “LID”. MNDOT, at the city’s request, has spent $100,000 on the ‘LID”. Over $500,000 is too much money to believe they are uncertain about the project. Later, they will tell us we have invested too much to cancel the “LID”.
It appears that if a resident requests a variance in the zoning laws, they are told no. If a developer wants to wants to build two stories more that the zoning laws, they are told yes.
The only way to get the city’s attention is to vote out the two incumbents—Kevin Staunton and Bob Stewart
In the September Edition of the Edina paper are listed 19 developments in Edina. It doesn’t include 4 recently completed and 14 additional projects at various stages of approval that will change the character of Edina for the worse.
Edina’s population is set to explode in the near future. The number of apartments will grow from 2,371 in 2017 to 8,230 or more in a few years. The Metropolitan Council projected Edina’s population in 2040 to be 55,100. I project population to grow to 66,000 as a result of this development, in just the next few years.
The Mayor and the City Council are rushing to approve development that will push population 20% higher than 2040 projections. They have not looked at the cumulative effects of this building boom. Do you want 20% more traffic on our streets in the next few years? Can we support 20% more kids in our schools? Are our parks and infrastructure capable of keeping up with the demand?Read more
In late August, candidates for Minnesota's third congressional district squared off in the first debate of this election cycle. They repeatedly clashed over whether last year's tax reform has improved the lives of Minnesota workers.
Dean Phillips, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor party nominee, argued that tax reform has mostly benefited the rich rather than average Minnesotans. Republican Congressman Erik Paulsen (right), who helped write the law, said it has boosted economic growth and put money back in workers' pockets.
So who's right? Well, let's look at what has happened across Minnesota since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act became law in late December.Read more
By Lew Coffey
"What the planning staff in Bloomington is proposing is modest and incremental movement along visible lines of change to accommodate trends visible today, without fundamental alteration of Bloomington’s quiet residential nature."
Somebody is planning your future, whether you know it or not. Every decade or so, every city government in the Metro Area is required by law to submit a general plan for the future of their community to the Metropolitan Council for its approval. The Metropolitan Council, receiving all these mandated community plans, has the job of putting them all together and making sure that they are all consistent and fit together into a coherent regional plan.
Each city’s plan is a broadly-based comprehensive look at the strengths and weaknesses, the trends of population and development and the wide range of possible outcomes that all of that data might suggest. It’s all a sort of “Here’s where we came from, here’s where we are, and here’s where we’d like to go!” exercise that every responsible management team needs to go through periodically, to stay prepared for the inevitable surprises that all too often explode “the best laid plans” with disturbing regularity.
As it’s normal role in this process, the Bloomington planning staff has recently held a series of presentations of its “Forward 2040 Comprehensive Plan” to elicit public reaction. As it turns out, the planning document turns out to be far more interesting as a statement of city government’s general mindset than perhaps they might have intended.Read more